4 ms·
Why does it have to be cheaper just because it's not physical? That's how the majority of people get games now. Not only would getting a physical disk be a has
by andrewzah 6y ago
Why does it have to be cheaper just because it's not physical? That's how the majority of people get games now.
Not only would getting a physical disk be a hassle compared to downloading, but I don't have a drive to put it in...
- echelon 6y agoDownloads for consoles always felt like risky propositions. They're DRMed. Once the console is no longer sold or supported, there's no store for you to connect to to validate or re-download your purchase. I don't feel comfortable with them living on an encrypted and unsupported hard disk partition. Do you anticipate playing your games again in 15 years? I like that I can play all of my old N64, Gamecube, and PS2 games on their original media.
- mcphage 6y agoI considered switching to mostly digital games for my Switch. Then I bought a Switch Lite for my daughter, and Nintendo's poor handling of digital titles when you own multiple consoles made me wish I had bought all of my titles physically. What we had to settle with: my daughter's Switch is the "primary console", and she can play any of the games I purchased digitally as her user, on her console. My Switch is the "secondary console", so I can only play my digital titles (a) as my own user, so my younger children have to play as my user rather than their own, AND (b) when I am connected to the internet, so I can't play digital titles in a car or on a plane. If I had gone with purely physical titles, I would have neither of those restrictions— and yeah, I do resent paying the same price for digital copies which are less useful.