2 ms·

> Their actions have, at least, influenced the proliferation of these weapons How? The number of nuclear weapons was growing rapidly until the 80s, to the poin

• crispyambulance 6y ago
  > How? The number of nuclear weapons was growing rapidly until the 80s. It's hard to assess their impact, but that doesn't mean it was insignificant. Could we have been in a worse position? Definitely. Someone might have "pushed the button" by now were it not for decades of work from organizations (some of whom consisted of scientists) lobbying against nuclear weapons and their proliferation. > Seeing the effects of bombs informed the public, not a committee The nuclear tests demonstrated that the weapons work. There are other effects such as "nuclear winter" that have not been (and hopefully never will be) demonstrated. Sadly, because of Chernobyl, we do have examples of what happens to contaminated areas. Understanding and communicating the effects beyond "blast radius" is best done by scientists and health experts.