3 ms·
> don't supply ML Tech for immoral use. But beyond that? There's a lot to that and it goes beyond the scope of what researchers can handle by themselves. It's
by crispyambulance 6y ago
> don't supply ML Tech for immoral use. But beyond that?
There's a lot to that and it goes beyond the scope of what researchers can handle by themselves. It's an effort that involves more than just the researchers, though they will take a central role.
For one thing, how do you evaluate whether a usage is "immoral"? How do you enforce correct usage? These are difficult questions with multifaceted answers which no one has yet elucidated (yes, it has to be more than "I'll know it when I see it").
- LatteLazy 6y agoThis is exactly my point. You can get general agreement to "do no evil". But every step you take to be specific makes the amount of discussion and detail exponentially more difficult. So you can't have a specific stance on everything. You either take a specific stance on a small number of issues central to the community or a general stance, or you spend all your time creating and amending stances and do nothing else.