> but it remains vague about whether Programmer A's judgement was correct at step 2 or 3! Which emphasizes the OP’s point that the article isn’t about what hap

> but it remains vague about whether Programmer A's judgement was correct at step 2 or 3! Which emphasizes the OP’s point that the article isn’t about what happens at steps 2 or 3 at all. So it’s not concerned with whether the judgment there was right or wrong.