3 ms·
As well as "I already have code in lang X" I'm hitting that at the moment with a moderately complex c# codebase that would be really useful to run natively in
by andybak 6y ago
As well as "I already have code in lang X"
I'm hitting that at the moment with a moderately complex c# codebase that would be really useful to run natively in the browser.
Yeah - I could rewrite it but I'd much rather not.
- wdroz 6y agoMaybe Blazor[0] could be a good fit for you. [0] -- https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet/web-apps/blazor https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet/web-apps/blazor
- andybak 6y agoYeah. I keep meaning to dig into Blazor but it seems overwhelming at first (especially because I'm mainly a C# dev due to Unity and a lot of the .NET jargon is foreign to me). There seems to be more lightweight "c# to web-assembly" routes than might be worth investigating.
- andybak 6y agoI think the complexity in Blazor might be a documentation issue. Every tutorial and quick start I can find assume you're knee deep in the ecosystem.
- seemslegit 6y agoJust out of curiosity, what kind of a moderately-complex codebase can be migrated to a browser setting from one that C# is currently running on without considerable refactoring or adaptations ?
- andybak 6y agoIt generates and manipulates 3d geometries. I currently render it in Unity but it would be nice to have a lightweight WebGL native library that could be used by three.js, A-Frame etc.