3 ms·
An intresting blog post, but a few comments... Switzerland has conscription which is conceptually very different from the 2nd amendment in both purpose and imp
by belorn 6y ago
An intresting blog post, but a few comments...
Switzerland has conscription which is conceptually very different from the 2nd amendment in both purpose and implementation. The US had conscription in the past but forcing people against their will to mandatory service is something which individualistic culture tend to dislike.
The effect of conscription on homicide rates is also a complex and difficult topic. There is definitive people who argue that forcing young adults into a pre-determined future is a good thing to shape young women and men into productive citizens. Others argue that robbing peoples right to choose their own destiny is very harmful to anyone who does not fit the mold.
Even with the possible benefits if, on the average, forcing young people into pre-determined destinies would produce more law abiding citizen, I would not personally be in favor of it. As someone who live in an other country with conscription, it is not worth it.
- jki275 6y agoConscription isn’t related to the second amendment at all. The US still has conscription. We haven’t called up a draft since the Vietnam war - but every adult male has to register, and there are consequences for failing to do so.
- int_19h 6y agoIn fact, even non-citizen residents have to register (except those who are on non-immigrant visas), and can be drafted if the draft is reactivated. This includes undocumented immigrants, regardless of whether they ever had a visa or not.
- jki275 6y agooh wow, I didn't even know that (the last part). I've always thought that if a non-citizen is inducted into the armed forces in any way they should immediately be eligible for citizenship. As I understand it, there's still a relatively complex process they have to navigate to get that done.