26 ms·
> a state that doesn’t care about, or is downright hostile to all things “technology”/“smart”. I know this is a generalization, but I find it kind of egregious
by zbaylin 6y ago
> a state that doesn’t care about, or is downright hostile to all things “technology”/“smart”.
I know this is a generalization, but I find it kind of egregious. Georgia is one of the only states left (AFAIK) where you can essentially attend an in-state college for free if you have a high enough GPA [0]. You can argue about the means by which that is achieved (the lottery), but as a current Tech student I know plenty of very talented students who wouldn't be able to attend college, let alone an engineering school, without these scholarship programs. I doubt that a state/government that truly was anti-technology or anti-"smart" would funnel what must be billions of dollars a year into academic scholarships.
[0]: https://www.gafutures.org/hope-state-aid-programs/hope-zell-miller-scholarships/ https://www.gafutures.org/hope-state-aid-programs/hope-zell-...
- wolco 6y agoIt is also the state where the governor said I didn't know COVID could be spread person to person. The people decided this man was the best person to make decisions on our behalf. Having a lottery determine who gets in is anti-smart (to steal your word) because it doesn't reward based on anything other than randomness. Maybe better described as socialist
- GA-defender 6y agoThe lottery he’s referring to is the state lottery, as in gambling. All proceeds from the state lottery must, by law, go fund pre-K education and college tuition. This was a necessary condition to legalize the lottery because conservative rural GA Christians believe lotteries are sinful. In GA pre-K and state colleges are free to state residents. What a backwards bunch of hicks! /sarcasm
- dpeck 6y agoLargely the state leadership is in for the economic benefits, but not the social consequences of having a more educated population.