I think co2 should have a cost associated with it and whatever technology is best in a given situation will be used. I have nothing against nuclear, but it isn'

I think co2 should have a cost associated with it and whatever technology is best in a given situation will be used. I have nothing against nuclear, but it isn't a silver bullet. Mandating nuclear is likely just as bad a move as mandating solar. I've also seen anti-nuclear activists pondering who paid off pro-nuckear climate activists. There are likely very few people being paid off on either side. It's silly to me the bad faith both sides have. People can think differently without being sold out.