3 ms·
> the code works fine and doesn't actually need abstraction Well, maybe it works fine. We didn't see the other 97 lines to verify that they actually include al
by humbledrone 6y ago
> the code works fine and doesn't actually need abstraction
Well, maybe it works fine. We didn't see the other 97 lines to verify that they actually include all the integers from 3-99 without skipping or duplicating any. (NB with a loop this verification would be trivial.)
- klyrs 6y agoMaybe they deleted 57 because it triggers an edge case. Put it back if you dare. ;) (no, that's the bad kind of tech debt that's unfortunately common and I actually hate)