5 ms·
These are the failures. There’s a common theme. 2005 — Desktop app for creative writers. Made about $90k in total over its 10 year history 2010 — Secret shar
by DarrenDev 6y ago
These are the failures. There’s a common theme.
2005 — Desktop app for creative writers. Made about $90k in total over its 10 year history
2010 — Secret sharing website. Made $0 revenue.
2011 — Hugely popular forum for poultry breeders in Ireland that ran for a few years. Made about $6k in advertising and sold it in 2015 for a few €k, can’t remember how much now.
2012 — Desktop journaling app. Made about $15k over its 5 year lifespan
2012 — Desktop password app. $3k over its short history.
2014 — Editing app for creative writers. Made about $20k over the 4 years.
2015 — Microsoft Word add-in for editing documents. Made about $50k over the past 5 years.
2017 — Another Desktop app for creative writers. See 2005 above. Made about $5k in two years before pulling the commercial version.
Takeaway: If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always gotten. Building B2C apps for consumers who don’t have money or don’t like spending money is a model for continuous failure. It took me a long time to realise this.
Current project is a B2B SaaS app for dev teams. Work in progress.
- escapist16 6y agoWow. That is impressive.How as the Desktop app for creative writers that you created in 2017 different from the one you created in 2005? And true, building B2C apps is always a gamble unless you have a product that contributes to user's forward movement.(What i mean by forward movement is that there is no going back to life without that product). Almost all of the B2C products that have made it large satisfy that criteria. All the best for your B2B app. By the way, your username seemed familiar - just looked it up on Indie Hackers and Bam! there you were. Followed you :)
- DarrenDev 6y ago>How as the Desktop app for creative writers that you created in 2017 different from the one you created in 2005? That's actually a very good question. The follow on question might be "Why did I think it would succeed in 2017 when it didn't succeed in 2005?"