2 ms·
Ah, not sure! Maybe you're right. But then it doesn't seem separate from your second point: "Also: Idiomatic Rust is already extremely fast, while in Haskell
by tome 6y ago
Ah, not sure! Maybe you're right. But then it doesn't seem separate from your second point: "Also: Idiomatic Rust is already extremely fast, while in Haskell it is non-trivial to implement high-performing code.".
- zetalemur 6y agoYou are technically correct. The best kind of correct. :)