I doubt that is true. SV crowd may be loud but they aren't the majority on HN. Here's how I would group HN based on income, what keywords make them click and d

I doubt that is true. SV crowd may be loud but they aren't the majority on HN. Here's how I would group HN based on income, what keywords make them click and demography. 1. Old system admins, FOSS lovers, and retired due to age folks. Around median income. Keywords - vim, Emacs, firefox, awk, unions, inequality, privacy, new tech bad, linux, open source projects, go, haiku, history, and against-big-tech. 2. Fresh college graduate/ enrolled in CS or equivalents, teenagers, hermits, and recently laid off. Below median income or none. Keywords - education, degrees, FAANGs, interviews, privacy, income inequality, against-the-popular-social-media, against-google-apple, firefox, chrome, free-speech, thought-crime, and twittter. 3. SV crowd, founders, and employees of a big company. Above median income. Keywords - rent, homelessness, parenting, investment, CA, economics, happiness, open source but the profitable or commerical kind (kubernetes tool, cockroachdb, materialize), startups, climate change, big-company-profit-loss, apple, security and immigration. 4. Researchers and retired by choice. Above Median or low/no income. Passive consumers so they click on wide variety of keywords. Occasionally, participate in something related to their field. 5. Long time active HN members. Above median or median income. They click on most posts on the front page but comment in their own silos or interests. They help direct the site by filtering from new or stopping hoard of initial comments. 6. Marketers, sales and non-tech crowd. Median or lower median income. Keywords - medium article, heres-why, how-I, growth, crypto, ads, effective-ways-to, and the likes. This is only my observation so it will be biased and wrong but I definitely don't think hners are 1%.