5 ms·
Perhaps it's not a problem with finance but a problem with other industries that don't pay their people well. Who is to say that a CDO isn't a valuable economic
by fleitz 16y ago
Perhaps it's not a problem with finance but a problem with other industries that don't pay their people well. Who is to say that a CDO isn't a valuable economic activity?
If creating a CDO creates more value to the economy than designing an automobile why shouldn't engineers focus on building those?
People forget that prices and money are essentially information about the supply and demand of a good. As we progress in the information age deriving information from price will consume and produce ever more of our GDP. Spending money efficiently and directing it to the right purposes is a VERY valuable thing for a nation to do. Perhaps, dare I say it, more valuable than engineering widgets.
If YC had engineers figuring out algorithms to determine the best startups and they found one that worked it would be a very valuable piece of information. Or more relevantly, what if you had a site that required a lot of bandwidth and you could buy a bandwidth future? If you could buy that sort of thing you could offer 4 year contracts to your customers with out taking on any risk.
How about this instrument, a YC Summer 2014 startup future, it estimates the expected return from S14 and pays you if the return is less than expected. YC could sell them today and gain the advantage of knowing how many startups they could fund in S14. It would allow all sorts of people to pool their knowledge about what the Summer 2014 startup scene is going to be like. You might want to buy one right before the S14 season because you know that some great startup is applying, etc. If you held office space in SOMA you could use this as a hedge against losses incurred due to a poor S14 startup season.
Most complicated financial instruments are actually risk mitigation and/or information pools. The fact that that kind of thing is pricable due to these engineers spreads all sorts of great information to our economy that you can use to make informed decisions about how to conduct your affairs and you don't even need to participate in the market to use it.
Want to know what the best guess as to the price of oil in 6 months? Check the oil futures market. This one number contains the all the information known to man, vetted by experts as to what the supply and demand of oil is going to be in a few months. It also allows anyone with new knowledge to monetize that information and communicate it to all participants almost instantly. Southwest can offer cheaper flights because they use oil and jet fuel futures to buy jet fuel, the brilliant thing is that Exxon also gains knowledge of what Southwest and every other airline expects their passenger load to be in a few months and can make decisions accordingly.
- shareme 16y agoall derivatives are not coupled to supply and demand hence their economic value as less than zero... Once you get off being coupled to supply and demand the cost of bailouts far out weighs any short term value
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- astrofinch 16y agoI find your arguments plausible, but many finance companies were bailed out in a big way by the government recently. I think it's possible that some of these companies were playing games that gave them a high probability of a decent gain and a small probability of a catastrophic loss. It seems unlikely that playing this sort of game contributes to more accurate pricing.
- fleitz 16y agoWell actually some of the guys who did VERY well did so by buying CDSs (credit default swaps) against CDOs (collateralized debt obligations) it's very likely that the bubble was curtailed before it got even further out of control as some very smart individuals were able to short the housing market via a CDS against a CDO. This pricing differential was essential to Goldman getting out of CDOs and into CDSs against CDOs after they figured out what John Paulson and others were up to. The price increase in CDSs against CDOs in retail mortgages alerted Goldman to the fact that people were very interested in a CDS against what they thought was a very solid asset (CDO consisting of residential mortgages). This is also why AIG got bailed out, GS had enough CDSs with AIG that if AIG went so would GS. I definitely agree with you that in the long run bailouts create an atmosphere of moral hazard and irrational exuberance. The problem also largely stems from political economics, as a representative you want to remain elected, therefore if you can kick the economic collapse can down the road a few years or spread its impact over many years you can stay in office. Therefore the rational economic choice for politicians is to favor bailouts. Very few people will not vote for you because 5 years later their taxes are 10% higher, but most will not vote for you if they lose their job. By the same token most people would rather take a 10% pay cut for 10 years than have no income for 1.