3 ms·
Latin is not a good comparison in this case. Latin is a dead language, but it never died. It slowly evolved into Late Latin, then Proto-Romance, then free of t
by simias 6y ago
Latin is not a good comparison in this case.
Latin is a dead language, but it never died. It slowly evolved into Late Latin,
then Proto-Romance, then free of the unifying influence of the Roman Empire the
languages started becoming mutually unintelligible across long distances and
evolved into their own things, eventually becoming Italian, Spanish, French,
Portuguese, Romanian, Catalan, Occitan etc... I over-simplify of course, but
that's the idea.
At no point was Latin replaced by anything else. If you had a time machine and
went to Rome, then started to slowly rewind back in time you'd slowly see the
language morphing back into Latin. If you did that in Paris, you'd hear the same
thing[1].
On top of that Latin was the lingua franca for science and arts for over a
thousand years. Through that route many words were loaned back into other
languages, sometimes forming doublets of words having a different meaning but
coming from the same Latin word through different routes. Take English "chair",
coming from Latin "cathedra" (seat) through Old French and "cathedral" coming
from... the same word, also through Old French but this time taking a detour
through the ecclesiastic language.
Gaelic's situation is utterly different. It hasn't evolved organically into a
different language that eventually became different enough as to be mutually
unintelligible, instead it's being replaced. It also has very little chance to
survive as a lingua franca like Latin because the language that replaces it
already does that better too. It's not a high prestige language that's used by
many 2nd language speakers like Latin was and English is.
[1] As a side note, that's why I can't stand ultra-prescriptivists. When a fellow
French speaker starts harping on about how the "kids can't speak right" and the
usual reactionary crap I usually ask them why they feel that way when they
speak such a broken mess of a low dialect of Latin themselves. I mean if it
doesn't have ablatives and deponent verbs it's not a real language as far as
I'm concerned.