> Google Search uses its monopoly to push their own AMP cache. I can't search in Google and load the content through Bing's AMP cache. That's nonsensical. That

> Google Search uses its monopoly to push their own AMP cache. I can't search in Google and load the content through Bing's AMP cache. That's nonsensical. That would reveal what the person searched for to a third party (Microsoft) even if they don't click on any results. The AMP Cache has to be controlled by the link aggregator in order to support safe prerendering, so Bing's AMP cache is used to prerender Bing results, and Google's AMP cache is used to prerender Google results. Compare to directly integrating with Google, in which case, Bing wouldn't get to take advantage of prerendering. The latter (the Apple News setup) is anti-competitive. AMP is not.