I found the Wikipedia article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_based_nanogalvanic_alloys https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_based_nanogalvanic_..

I found the Wikipedia article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_based_nanogalvanic_alloys https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_based_nanogalvanic_... Saying this ignores basic physics is like saying gasoline engines ignore basic physics. No one is saying that it's free energy. The question is, what is the energy to produce/recycle the alloy? How many miles can you get out of a reasonable supply of the alloy before replacing it? If those numbers are good enough, maybe they'll perform better than battery vehicles. And so I'm asking what's the state of that research.