3 ms·
That’s because even one example suffices to prove an existential claim such as masks can interfere with breathing. That’s not true for universal claims such as
by User23 6y ago
That’s because even one example suffices to prove an existential claim such as masks can interfere with breathing. That’s not true for universal claims such as masks don’t interfere with breathing.
- ceejayoz 6y agoThe claim was "Wearing masks do not affect oxygen intake", not "they can't impact breathing in any fashion". You'd have to rule out confounding variables like panic attacks, nervousness, etc. - especially in first-time medical workers - and obtain actual evidence of impact on oxygen saturation for those anecdotes to be useful.
- User23 6y agoYou must be confusing me with another commenter. I specifically said: “complaining about masks interfering with their breathing.”