3 ms·
The original Facebook and Google did not use much JavaScript, so I'm always skeptical when literal documents need it for anything other than ads (and even then.
by iamstupidsimple 6y ago
The original Facebook and Google did not use much JavaScript, so I'm always skeptical when literal documents need it for anything other than ads (and even then...).
- colejohnson66 6y agoAnd the screen refreshed every time you did something as it loaded a new page. Just because it’s abused doesn’t mean JS doesn’t have uses.
- lal 6y agothe screen refreshed every time you browsed to new content or did something that required accessing new content, as one would intuitively expect
- ddalex 6y agoI never understood the hangup on screen refreshes - I mean, why is it important that the screen doesn't refresh? And if it's that important that EVERYBODY deploys JS to render client side to avoid the refreshes, why isn't this handled at the browser level in the first place (i.e. declare "ExtendDisplayTime"-something on your document and the browser should replace the screen content only AFTER the new page is completely painted). But at the core of it, the web is a document-display system, and back-hammering and shoe-horning apps that masquerade as documents will always be painful.