4 ms·
I think the intention was to say only that it’s “an accident” that they are double quadratic numbers, not that they have the exact values they have. Which is in
by boublepop 6y ago
I think the intention was to say only that it’s “an accident” that they are double quadratic numbers, not that they have the exact values they have. Which is intended to say that the reason is different even if the result is the same.
- Viliam1234 6y agoIs it "an accident" that 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2 ? I suppose the only way to get quadratic numbers "non-accidentally" would be to have the electrons stand in n×n square formation.
- xingyzt 6y agoThese are the numbers that ‘wrap’ around themselves to form squares. 7777 5557 3357 1357