3 ms·
I really like the intention and good will behind the post but almost every part is incorrect (even on an abstract level not restricting to bitcoin). I feel lik
by shuringai 6y ago
I really like the intention and good will behind the post but almost every part is incorrect (even on an abstract level not restricting to bitcoin).
I feel like OP is yet another someone who needed the keyword "blockchain expert" on his/her linkedin profile and trying to justify it now with misleading and incomplete information.
- martinko 6y agoCould you give some examples of what is incorrect?
- tluyben2 6y agoThis is HN; you are supposed to point out (like some people have in this thread about the leading 000 count) the incorrect parts, providing some links or explanation why they are incorrect. Many people probably clicked here to learn something and so it's helpful to point out what they should be learning instead of this if it is 'incorrect'.
- monokh 6y ago(author here) I'd love to know the inaccuracies so I can address it. Generally I tried to simplify things to make it easy to follow in code. Anything worth noting can be added and I've done this with some things brought up in this thread. I'd love to do the same with your suggestions. I already qualify for the "blockchain expert" tag by working in the space for 2 years, though I don't find it that desirable. Maybe a few years ago.