3 ms·
HN uses downvotes for disagreement, not just because someone is being a jerk. How is that good? The top comment becomes the group-think comment.
by 762236 6y ago
HN uses downvotes for disagreement, not just because someone is being a jerk. How is that good? The top comment becomes the group-think comment.
- mjevans 6y agoI want to elaborate: Downvotes are good for BAD COMMENTS. Things which do not add constructively to a discussion. If someone DISAGREES however, that is what a reply beneath stating the disagreement is for.
- holler 6y agothe problem is that it can be abused too easily
- perl4ever 6y agoThere's always going to be, subjectively, a lot of overlap between those two categories in looking at the comments of others. I know I'm not a troll, so obviously if someone downvotes me it's because they disagree and therefore unfair. But maybe not from their perspective. You can also downvote and reply; I don't know how common that is. But given the number of people who say they don't know why they are downvoted, it seems to me like a reasonable thing to do.
- glogla 6y agoYes. "Look at this cool thing MS/Google is doing!" and "Look at this evil thing MS/Google is doing!" can both be seen as trolly agenda comments and relevant ones, depending on where you stand.
- jessaustin 6y agoI really hope FTC or at least the Europeans will stop that merger...
- dingaling 6y agoPerhaps there should be another voting option, for 'disagree', with a visible counter beside the post
- commander_k33n 6y agoI agree. Would be cool if "downvote"(for relevance)and "disagree" would be mutually exclusive (either/or). You either decide this post is not relevant to the discussion at all or you disagree with the argument. "Upvote" for relevance and "disagree" could be combined. You decide this post is relevant to the discussion but you disagree with the argument. Of course everything depends on users using the tools in good faith. But it would be an interesting approach to decouple "downvoting" from "disagreement".