3 ms·
I kind of agree with you, wind energy on land influences our ecosystem more than nuclear energy - nonetheless there is more tangible pollution by nuclear power
by tommyage 6y ago
I kind of agree with you, wind energy on land influences our ecosystem more than nuclear energy - nonetheless there is more tangible pollution by nuclear power plants. Additionally one (parliament) may has to justify a power plant since there is a responsibility to neighbouring countries and the ecosystem. Nuclear energy _always_ implies a risk. The demand on energy is always increasing and such a power plant works in proportions which are not conceivable for us citiziens.
I am proud of my nation: We shifted our values - we rated our ecosystem higher than competitive advantages.
- DarthGhandi 6y ago> nonetheless there is more tangible pollution by nuclear power plants I'm struggling to see this. Do you mean uranium mining? The pollution associated with the rare Earth metals to build a turbine is a magnitude greater.
- tommyage 6y agoI am referring to the waste associated with the operation of the power plant as such. There is propably a break even point in terms of pollution where nuclear power plants fail in comparsion to alternative power sources.