> The post you're responding to literally links an SAA magazine section wholly devoted to rebutting just one of Hancock's books. I didn’t say there weren’t reb

> The post you're responding to literally links an SAA magazine section wholly devoted to rebutting just one of Hancock's books. I didn’t say there weren’t rebuttals. I didn’t even say he wasn’t a crank, only you can’t exactly apply the “we are to busy forwarding our field to stop and address every idea from every crank” argument to someone whose ideas (for better or worse) are gaining notoriety as potentially true and correct.