3 ms·
Why that book and not, say, Capital? Friedman is hardly unusual to run into in the US so I'm a little confused why you would consider that a distinguishing fact
by monadic2 6y ago
Why that book and not, say, Capital? Friedman is hardly unusual to run into in the US so I'm a little confused why you would consider that a distinguishing factor. Why not just label them a Friedman fan and move on?
- WalterBright 6y agoBecause Monetary History is a long, complex book and someone willing to make the effort is going to be more interesting.