I would like someone to professionally dispute and counter Graham Hancock's work. And I don't mean a random blog posts or some short clip of him having a godawf

I would like someone to professionally dispute and counter Graham Hancock's work. And I don't mean a random blog posts or some short clip of him having a godawful debate. I mean a thorough break down of "Graham says X, in reality it's Y." He has published a handful of books. It shouldn't be that difficult to find word-for-word factually incorrect statements he has made, that he still clings onto, that can be readily disproven. The Joe Rogan show that he did where he debated was nice, but again, it's more for entertainment. Near the end it turned into ad hominem attacks against him and had some libelous pieces too. He could have taken legal action against the person. So far all I have heard have been, to say the least, vague statements of how he is wrong, how he's causing archaeologists to have a bad rap, and whatnot. Okay then, show me the work. I haven't found much in the way of anyone refuting his biggest points, namely the ridiculously precise celestial knowledge of the temple builders, and how these temples came to be constructed so well, considering they are massive slabs of stone that remain to this day. He touches on things like water erosion patterns and whatnot in areas that have seen very little water. At least one of these should be easily disprovable.