To me, the alarms sound way before that. You can change the tune of your idea if you need to persuade people, while at the same time being honest about it. Wha

To me, the alarms sound way before that. You can change the tune of your idea if you need to persuade people, while at the same time being honest about it. What I don't like about Hancock is that he uses Gobekli Tepe as a prop: we don't know the whole story/history about it, but he will gladfully use it to support his claims, without actually producing evidence that furthers our knowledge on what Gobekli was! I can surely entertain the idea of lost civilizations, but that doesn't imply I validate the dishonest handling of unknowns as "evidence". This is what pseudoscience and con men do to appear respectable.