I do think they are on any company that is not majority-owned by someone that cares. Morality and integrity are acceptable in large companies so long as they c

I do think they are on any company that is not majority-owned by someone that cares. Morality and integrity are acceptable in large companies so long as they can bring some benefit. Otherwise they somehow always seem to find a way to justify doing even the most immorally-seeming stuff (like exploiting workers in third-world-country mines, selling weapons to dictators and so on). What's more important: why wouldn't it be like this? Why would a top-level exec leave money on the table for moral reasons? How would they sell that to their stakeholders?