4 ms·
It's good to see a status update for Vue 3, and creatively done I must say. If Vue's (Vuex) TypeScript support wasn't as bad as it is in Vue 2, I would not be a
by adevx 6y ago
It's good to see a status update for Vue 3, and creatively done I must say. If Vue's (Vuex) TypeScript support wasn't as bad as it is in Vue 2, I would not be as eagerly awaiting this 3.0 release. Currently on the fence to rewrite a large project to Next.js + TypeScript + Mobx as I have to move things forward and expect the whole ecosystem to take a long time to catch up.
- gedy 6y ago> Next.js + TypeScript + Mobx That's honestly a nice stack and don't see how you would regret it
- jadbox 6y agoI've been starting a new project using Svelte + Routity + TailwindCss. It's been an amazingly productively stack, although the tooling is on the young side with occasional rough edges. Overall though, it feels great. Even for a side project, it's fun to pick up as it's pretty minimal framework overhead to learn. There's several templates out there, but I've created this one for specifically the above stack: https://github.com/jadbox/routify-starter/tree/tailwind https://github.com/jadbox/routify-starter/tree/tailwind
- bogdanu 6y agoHow do you guys even manage to convince your client/employer to use a stack so young? Assuming it's not a side project, ofc.
- adevx 6y agoI run a small business where my website generates my main income. So if I make the wrong choice here it's all on me. But I don't think it's that young in web-cycle terms.
- adevx 6y agoSounds like a great stack. I was also looking for a clean, simple and productive stack and looked into Svelte. But I do really enjoy TypeScript and it does not seem to be well supported.
- xellisx 6y agohttp://aurelia.io/ http://aurelia.io/