At the end of the day, a wiki (or any UGC system) is only as good as the admins who have the final say on what is published. As good a Wikipedia is, it's dange

At the end of the day, a wiki (or any UGC system) is only as good as the admins who have the final say on what is published. As good a Wikipedia is, it's dangerous for it to be the only "legitimate" one. Thanks to the open license, there should be many forks by people striving to do better or with a different editorial tilt (without needing to all the way to fringe like Conservapedia and even Rationalwiki.) Even Uncyclopedia deserves some competition.