5 ms·
I like your comment. Plus then you wouldn't need to give apple 30% of your money, and spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on an Apple product, and pay for t
by tkeAmarktinClss 6y ago
I like your comment.
Plus then you wouldn't need to give apple 30% of your money, and spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on an Apple product, and pay for their dev kit.
"Win win win"
- zbrozek 6y agoI've found little value in native apps over a bookmark on a homescreen. Where I've needed apps I try to restrict permissions as much as possible, or disable/remove them completely if they're infrequently used.
- WrtCdEvrydy 6y agoUnfortunately, Apple has gone out and kneecapped their own browser to prevent this.
- echelon 6y agoWhich is why the DOJ should break the company up. They're a monopoly and they're using their power to extort developers and their customers.
- treve 6y agoThey're not a monopoly, not even a majority. You have choices, but you're not making them.
- bencollier49 6y agoAre they a monopoly in the market for iOS apps?
- echelon 6y agoNobody wishing to do commerce on the iPhone platform has a choice. We only have two options in this country and they both suck. The web would have won were it not for Apple's insurmountable power. We have to break Apple and Google up or force them to make a first-class application marketplace they don't control and don't tax.