5 ms·

Stop using apps. Seriously. Stop. Apps allow far deeper and richer access to various data structures than what should be allowed; this has been proven time an

Stop using apps. Seriously. Stop. Apps allow far deeper and richer access to various data structures than what should be allowed; this has been proven time and again since mobile OS existed, I think both Apple and Google are to blame for ever allowing developers to freely access whatever they wanted, whenever they wanted, to upload it to any server, without any transparency or oversight (and that's a huge problem on Android, still). If you can, use the browser (the new Firefox for Android is quite good), which at least limits your exposure to these third parties accessing information they should not. old.reddit works okay in the browser, I am not so sure about LinkedIn as I don't use it. These days I just rely on using TOR for things like email, Protonmail has a .onion address which is a nice bonus. I carry very few apps on my device, and I make an effort to exclusively use those found on f-droid, open source, not many permissions. It's the biggest perk of Android; you can use any store you like, and most APKs install absolutely fine. Disable Play Services and various other tweaks and you're okay.

tkeAmarktinClss 6y ago
I like your comment. Plus then you wouldn't need to give apple 30% of your money, and spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on an Apple product, and pay for their dev kit. "Win win win"
- zbrozek 6y ago
  I've found little value in native apps over a bookmark on a homescreen. Where I've needed apps I try to restrict permissions as much as possible, or disable/remove them completely if they're infrequently used.
- WrtCdEvrydy 6y ago
  Unfortunately, Apple has gone out and kneecapped their own browser to prevent this.
  - echelon 6y ago
    Which is why the DOJ should break the company up. They're a monopoly and they're using their power to extort developers and their customers.
    - treve 6y ago
      They're not a monopoly, not even a majority. You have choices, but you're not making them.
      - bencollier49 6y ago
        Are they a monopoly in the market for iOS apps?
      - echelon 6y ago
        Nobody wishing to do commerce on the iPhone platform has a choice. We only have two options in this country and they both suck. The web would have won were it not for Apple's insurmountable power. We have to break Apple and Google up or force them to make a first-class application marketplace they don't control and don't tax.
bathtub365 6y ago
It's really sad that the Web, full of terrible JavaScript and tracking, is being pitched as the safer alternative to applications. Keep in mind that unless you somehow run a version of a Web application locally, every interaction with it is traceable. Advertising parasites have eaten the world.
- rohan1024 6y ago
  >every action with website is traceable. Traceable but not the kind of access an app has. Traceability can be spoofed not the data that app is reading from your device. No website is ever going to ask your contacts permission to proceed further while their are tonne of apps that won't let you use app if you reject that permission. For example, GPay in India needs freaking location permission. God knows what it does with that data.
  - bathtub365 6y ago
    Websites request access to my location data constantly. They also likely have some semblance of where I am even before they ask due to IP geolocation. If I'm using an offline application this transaction wouldn't be happening. My point isn't that either apps or the Web are better. It's a more fundamental issue of software I use constantly talking to systems I don't control. It just so happens that the Web only exists if I accept that this will happen. Applications can exist even if I don't.
- TedDoesntTalk 6y ago
  These apps are copying clipboard content while you are using other apps. No website can do that for another website.
  - bathtub365 6y ago
    Yes, but also, no website can exist without knowing how I'm interacting with it.
    - deleted 6y ago
Silhouette 6y ago
Apps are definitely a train wreck in terms of privacy and security, and it's definitely at least partly the responsibility of Apple and Google for allowing that abusive behaviour at OS/API level in the first place. Then again, take a look at your desktop/laptop OS, and by comparison mobile devices are almost fortress-like in their protections. We're still using security models based on the threats of several decades ago, with barely any attempt made by any of the major desktop OSes to develop a suitable defence to the biggest threats of 2020. The real problem here, IMNSHO, is that most users don't take privacy and security seriously, which in turn is at least partly because most users lack even rudimentary understanding of what is happening and what could be done about it. Almost everyone suddenly has a life full of small, somewhat independent devices with significant computing power, sensors, and external connectivity. Even people who choose not to use such devices themselves will still find themselves affected by this technology because so many other people around them do use it, so unless you're willing to become some sort of modern-day hermit, you can't entirely escape the trap. But until public awareness is increased, until these issues start becoming a matter of real competition and hitting inferior product developers in their quarterly results, until there is enough concern over the more serious abuses for politicians to learn about these issues properly themselves and legislate or regulate accordingly, trying to stay off as many radars as we can is sadly the only realistic strategy. You can avoid installing untrusted software on your computers and putting IoT devices in your home, and that's a significant improvement, but it's still far from ideal.
- derefr 6y ago
  > We're still using security models based on the threats of several decades ago, with barely any attempt made by any of the major desktop OSes to develop a suitable defence to the biggest threats of 2020. If you think in terms of who the paying customers were/are for desktop OSes (by-and-large, corporations and governments), the "threats of several decades ago" were—and continue to be—real threats to them (vis. industrial espionage/cyberwar); whereas the modern "threats" aren't things that threaten their interests at all, "only" things that affect the lives of individuals. A corporation won't lose money because a rival knows everything about its employees shopping habits. Insofar as nobody's currently making money selling a desktop OS to consumers (Microsoft sells cloud with the OS as a loss-leader; Apple sells the hardware with the OS as a cost-center; and RedHat, Canonical, VMWare, etc. only make money from enterprise support) there's nobody incentivized to protect the wellbeing of individual customers on the desktop.
bjarneh 6y ago
i.reddit.com works very well on mobile devices
- rohan1024 6y ago
  For time being. It was never improved and was lacking in some aspects and now videos won't open on it but the new mobile website. It's just a matter of time before they scrap i.reddit.com
  - bjarneh 6y ago
    Perhaps not 100%, but I've never considered installing the app. The regular mobile experience on Reddit is unbearable.
    - ripdog 6y ago
      Reddit has an open API, with a rich ecosystem of third-party apps. If the website annoys you, there are plenty of high-quality alternatives.
      - bjarneh 6y ago
        What are the best alternatives?
        oneweekwonder 6y ago
        imho https://reddit.premii.com/ https://reddit.premii.com/
        ripdog 6y ago
        I recommend trying a bunch, but I can recommend Sync for reddit and Boost for reddit. Both are for Android, by the way.
bob1029 6y ago
The sandboxed-by-default experience offered by browsers is an excellent security boundary these days. Decades of experience has built a very good process around how arbitrary code should run (or not run) on client devices. Sure, you still have to deal with tracking cookies and the like, but this a tiny amount of pain compared to what a full native app could do to you without your awareness. Wiping the slate with a web browser is a fairly trivial exercise too. Progressive web applications are the best and brightest future we have. I can only hope that some sort of antitrust shake-up forces vendors like Apple to fully-embrace PWAs and other such alternatives. When looking at the technical specifications, there isn't a whole lot of good reasoning for requiring native apps outside of exclusivity and control over their ecosystem.
deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
IG_Semmelweiss 6y ago
Honest question. I never updated stock Droid OS on my 2017 phone. I disabled most google incl Google Play, Gmail, yet the system does not let me disable PLAY Services How do you disable play services?

tkeAmarktinClss 6y ago

I like your comment. Plus then you wouldn't need to give apple 30% of your money, and spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on an Apple product, and pay for their dev kit. "Win win win"

zbrozek 6y ago
I've found little value in native apps over a bookmark on a homescreen. Where I've needed apps I try to restrict permissions as much as possible, or disable/remove them completely if they're infrequently used.
WrtCdEvrydy 6y ago
Unfortunately, Apple has gone out and kneecapped their own browser to prevent this.
- echelon 6y ago
  Which is why the DOJ should break the company up. They're a monopoly and they're using their power to extort developers and their customers.
  - treve 6y ago
    They're not a monopoly, not even a majority. You have choices, but you're not making them.
    - bencollier49 6y ago
      Are they a monopoly in the market for iOS apps?
    - echelon 6y ago
      Nobody wishing to do commerce on the iPhone platform has a choice. We only have two options in this country and they both suck. The web would have won were it not for Apple's insurmountable power. We have to break Apple and Google up or force them to make a first-class application marketplace they don't control and don't tax.

bathtub365 6y ago

It's really sad that the Web, full of terrible JavaScript and tracking, is being pitched as the safer alternative to applications. Keep in mind that unless you somehow run a version of a Web application locally, every interaction with it is traceable. Advertising parasites have eaten the world.

rohan1024 6y ago
>every action with website is traceable. Traceable but not the kind of access an app has. Traceability can be spoofed not the data that app is reading from your device. No website is ever going to ask your contacts permission to proceed further while their are tonne of apps that won't let you use app if you reject that permission. For example, GPay in India needs freaking location permission. God knows what it does with that data.
- bathtub365 6y ago
  Websites request access to my location data constantly. They also likely have some semblance of where I am even before they ask due to IP geolocation. If I'm using an offline application this transaction wouldn't be happening. My point isn't that either apps or the Web are better. It's a more fundamental issue of software I use constantly talking to systems I don't control. It just so happens that the Web only exists if I accept that this will happen. Applications can exist even if I don't.
TedDoesntTalk 6y ago
These apps are copying clipboard content while you are using other apps. No website can do that for another website.
- bathtub365 6y ago
  Yes, but also, no website can exist without knowing how I'm interacting with it.
  - deleted 6y ago

Silhouette 6y ago

Apps are definitely a train wreck in terms of privacy and security, and it's definitely at least partly the responsibility of Apple and Google for allowing that abusive behaviour at OS/API level in the first place. Then again, take a look at your desktop/laptop OS, and by comparison mobile devices are almost fortress-like in their protections. We're still using security models based on the threats of several decades ago, with barely any attempt made by any of the major desktop OSes to develop a suitable defence to the biggest threats of 2020. The real problem here, IMNSHO, is that most users don't take privacy and security seriously, which in turn is at least partly because most users lack even rudimentary understanding of what is happening and what could be done about it. Almost everyone suddenly has a life full of small, somewhat independent devices with significant computing power, sensors, and external connectivity. Even people who choose not to use such devices themselves will still find themselves affected by this technology because so many other people around them do use it, so unless you're willing to become some sort of modern-day hermit, you can't entirely escape the trap. But until public awareness is increased, until these issues start becoming a matter of real competition and hitting inferior product developers in their quarterly results, until there is enough concern over the more serious abuses for politicians to learn about these issues properly themselves and legislate or regulate accordingly, trying to stay off as many radars as we can is sadly the only realistic strategy. You can avoid installing untrusted software on your computers and putting IoT devices in your home, and that's a significant improvement, but it's still far from ideal.

derefr 6y ago
> We're still using security models based on the threats of several decades ago, with barely any attempt made by any of the major desktop OSes to develop a suitable defence to the biggest threats of 2020. If you think in terms of who the paying customers were/are for desktop OSes (by-and-large, corporations and governments), the "threats of several decades ago" were—and continue to be—real threats to them (vis. industrial espionage/cyberwar); whereas the modern "threats" aren't things that threaten their interests at all, "only" things that affect the lives of individuals. A corporation won't lose money because a rival knows everything about its employees shopping habits. Insofar as nobody's currently making money selling a desktop OS to consumers (Microsoft sells cloud with the OS as a loss-leader; Apple sells the hardware with the OS as a cost-center; and RedHat, Canonical, VMWare, etc. only make money from enterprise support) there's nobody incentivized to protect the wellbeing of individual customers on the desktop.

bjarneh 6y ago

i.reddit.com works very well on mobile devices

rohan1024 6y ago
For time being. It was never improved and was lacking in some aspects and now videos won't open on it but the new mobile website. It's just a matter of time before they scrap i.reddit.com
- bjarneh 6y ago
  Perhaps not 100%, but I've never considered installing the app. The regular mobile experience on Reddit is unbearable.
  - ripdog 6y ago
    Reddit has an open API, with a rich ecosystem of third-party apps. If the website annoys you, there are plenty of high-quality alternatives.
    - bjarneh 6y ago
      What are the best alternatives?
      - oneweekwonder 6y ago
        imho https://reddit.premii.com/ https://reddit.premii.com/
      - ripdog 6y ago
        I recommend trying a bunch, but I can recommend Sync for reddit and Boost for reddit. Both are for Android, by the way.

bob1029 6y ago

The sandboxed-by-default experience offered by browsers is an excellent security boundary these days. Decades of experience has built a very good process around how arbitrary code should run (or not run) on client devices. Sure, you still have to deal with tracking cookies and the like, but this a tiny amount of pain compared to what a full native app could do to you without your awareness. Wiping the slate with a web browser is a fairly trivial exercise too. Progressive web applications are the best and brightest future we have. I can only hope that some sort of antitrust shake-up forces vendors like Apple to fully-embrace PWAs and other such alternatives. When looking at the technical specifications, there isn't a whole lot of good reasoning for requiring native apps outside of exclusivity and control over their ecosystem.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

IG_Semmelweiss 6y ago

Honest question. I never updated stock Droid OS on my 2017 phone. I disabled most google incl Google Play, Gmail, yet the system does not let me disable PLAY Services How do you disable play services?