And: https://reactivity.ai/#about https://reactivity.ai/#about Edit: to respond to the question below, it clearly supports a "renaissance man" question by

And: https://reactivity.ai/#about https://reactivity.ai/#about Edit: to respond to the question below, it clearly supports a "renaissance man" question by IAmGraydon above: it confirms both a "“consultant software engineer” in finance" and a "masters in CS." I don't see how it is not relevant. Moreover, it's not that somebody questioned atemerev's posts based on his qualifications, it's atemerev who claimed to be "an actual epidemiologist" in his first sentence, and that it definitely something that can be tested for veracity, if atamarev wanted to give more credibility to his claim with that (he didn't have to do that -- and then his claim could be evaluated on its own too, but biases by the authors of some claims are also something that could be questioned). Anyway, in this case, it's obvious that atemerev's university degree isn't in epidemiology. Edit2: atemerev's first claim: "an actual epidemiologist" now gets to be closer to the truth in the response below as "an epidemic modeler." I still believe IAmGraydon was right to question the claim, and that the initial claim was indeed misleading and incorrect.