"Also interesting that Facebook is the bad guy here instead of the actual side [sic] owner including the widget." Facebook is doing the wiretapping, not the si

"Also interesting that Facebook is the bad guy here instead of the actual side [sic] owner including the widget." Facebook is doing the wiretapping, not the site owner. Perhaps you are suggesting that the plaintiffs could allege a conspiracy to commit wiretapping? These cases never succeed because the damages are too speculative. What injury/harm have the plaintiffs suffered as a result of the wiretapping? How can that be quantified?