3 ms·
While I agree with his focus on users, he has passed up a valuable coaching opportunity and probably antagonized a whole bunch of developers. He turned a potent
by srram 16y ago
While I agree with his focus on users, he has passed up a valuable coaching opportunity and probably antagonized a whole bunch of developers. He turned a potential coaching opportunity into a pissing match. Ridiculing volunteers on a open source project is inappropriate, irrespective of whether the opinion of that person was right or wrong.
- gommm 16y agoIf you look at the history, the comments at the beginning were much less abrasive. It's only after the discussion continued for a long time that he started being more aggressive in his comments.
- jpk 16y agoBut I think it's wise, in all debates, to maintain that civility. At the end of the day, which comments are getting the attention? I think he's right, I think it's important to defend what he thinks is right, and I understand how it can be frustrating, but we all just have to have the fortitude keep the flames in check.
- vacri 16y agoAt the end of the day, which comments are getting the attention? The ones with content. In the sample quotes in the article, Linux is attacking ideas and attitudes, not people.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- vacri 16y agohe has passed up a valuable coaching opportunity ??? In the comment I read, he goes into detail about why it's wrong. His next comment that starts "Bullshit." goes into 500 words of coaching. He is backing up his arguments with developer-level people here, not newbie coders who are still figuring out how an array works.