And just to get my word out there: I think the transgender passage was kind of meh. To me it sounds like the article conflates the fact that biological sex exis

And just to get my word out there: I think the transgender passage was kind of meh. To me it sounds like the article conflates the fact that biological sex exists with the idea that it's somehow extremely important in our everyday life. I think it's important to respect everyone's biological needs but the way we see each other should definitely be our gender identity. Pressing on "the importance of biological sex" kinda feels like a good way to make people believe their identity must be defined by their biology. (By the way, I am curios as to how biological sex is treated during a transition. Like, changing your body isn't instantaneous, apart from that there's also intersex people, so is it really all-binary from a scientific POV?) And the Rowling piece kinda read like a non-apology to me, sorry.