An appeal to free speech made insincerely isn't much of an appeal. The question is whether she feels strongly enough about the inherent value of contrasting en

An appeal to free speech made insincerely isn't much of an appeal. The question is whether she feels strongly enough about the inherent value of contrasting enough to preserve them in her own recommendations. And she doesn't. She's Just Another Angry Libertarian, only protesting when "her" side is criticized. If you agree with her, she makes sense. If you don't, she seems... duplicitous. To wit: I don't trust this woman (or most of the posters here) to preserve my speech. Or that of many others. I mean, we're literally seeing armed suppression of peaceful protestors in the news. And what's the Real Problem in her head? The protestors. Because they yelled at people on the internet.