4 ms·
But it doesn't work that way. If there's an entity already there, then the difference is split. You can't just extend your territorial jurisdiction and take o
by jki275 6y ago
But it doesn't work that way.
If there's an entity already there, then the difference is split. You can't just extend your territorial jurisdiction and take over another country.
- yongjik 6y agoBut that's begging the question, isn't it? If the UK recognizes Sealand as another country, then of course the difference is split. But the UK clearly doesn't, so it will just consider Sealand part of its territorial waters, and every other country (that doesn't recognize Sealand) will side with UK here.
- 6nf 6y agoThe UK argues that nobody recognised Sealand as a legitimate entity so there's no dispute. I'm not aware of any other countries officially recognizing Sealand as a sovereign nation before the border change.
- _-___________-_ 6y agoOf course you can. There might be consequences, of course, but in the case of Sealand it's very unlikely any other nation will care enough to do anything.
- mewse-hn 6y ago"You can't just extend your territorial jurisdiction and take over another country." laughs in british
- AdrianB1 6y agoThere are 2 famous cases in the recent history, one is Russia in Crimea and another one was supposed to start yesterday near the Dead Sea. Big fish eats small fish.