3 ms·
While this is about free speech, its more specifically about whether you can class social media as a platform or a publisher. Publishers are liable. Platforms
by waheoo 6y ago
While this is about free speech, its more specifically about whether you can class social media as a platform or a publisher.
Publishers are liable. Platforms are not.
I simply want social media to get off the fence.
Because right now they sre misleading the public, telling them they can post whatever they want, and then flipping on them when it suits.
Nobody will turn away from social media until this is clear and understood.
If you defined facebook as a publisher, you will see a replacement valuing openness rise up within days.
Which would win is hard to say. Maybe people like being sheep. But at least this way they know what they are.
- joshuamorton 6y agoThis is legally speaking, nonsense. Us law doesn't differentiate between publishers and platforms with regard to content liability. Everyone is liable for first party content, but not for third party content.
- esyir 6y agoThe point of messing with section 230 is to undo that. Basically, it's the first party starts curating the third party, they're now "publishing" that