5 ms·
Exactly. The parent to your reply typifies the intellectual dishonesty we’re seeing in the anti-protest efforts. It’s really pathetic.
by aklemm 6y ago
Exactly. The parent to your reply typifies the intellectual dishonesty we’re seeing in the anti-protest efforts. It’s really pathetic.
- Nextgrid 6y agoI am not anti-protest at all and actually support the BLM cause. To be honest I have nothing to gain from taking any side anyway. However, I am very concerned that not posting something can now be seen as a bad thing. It used to be that as long as you don't post "bad" things you'll be fine, now it seems that you have to post certain things (potentially contrary to your interests, opinions or the primary purpose of that particular social media feed) otherwise you'll be labelled as a "bad" person. When does it end? Does not having any significant social media presence on which to post this stuff now also make you a "bad" person?
- dundarious 6y agoShe did post a bad thing, and someone made a reference to BLM as a big societal thing someone might post about instead. You could get the same point across with "instead of posting about building her new gaming rig". There isn't even a quotation on the BLM remark.