3 ms·
> To be frank - that seems very selfish. No, it seems logical: if the elderly are at risk, by all means, let them shelter at home and give them money without d
by 1996 6y ago
> To be frank - that seems very selfish.
No, it seems logical: if the elderly are at risk, by all means, let them shelter at home and give them money without destroying the economy (as the elderly as less likely to be employed).
Even better, for old people who need to work, give them full pay every week, and just ask them in return to stay at home and use uber eats.
But we didn't do that. Too bad: it would still have saved a lot of money (and the actual economy)
> I hope that we'll have a vaccine soon
I will be generous enough to not claim my dose, to let you and others test it first, to make sure there are no autoimmune diseases or other bad things it can trigger
- monocasa 6y agoMy 38 yo healthy coworker died from it. It's not just the elderly at risk.
- kyleee 6y agoAny comorbidities?
- chrisco255 6y agoIn Texas, the 30-39 year old group accounts for 2% of all Covid-19 deaths. The 80+ bracket accounts for 40% of all deaths. https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83 https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#...
- paul_f 6y agoNobody is claiming no risk for younger age groups. We have to manage risk and decide policy based on the size of the risk. Which is exceedingly small for that age group.