> Or it's an argument that a voting system should have both hand-counting and digital counting, because rigging both counts is at least twice as difficult as ri

> Or it's an argument that a voting system should have both hand-counting and digital counting, because rigging both counts is at least twice as difficult as rigging one. Unless the party rigging the counts is the one currently in power. Which in my opinion is the main risk, however minuscule and unrealistic.