2 ms·
> considered by many to have been a brutal ruler He raided these places in military campaigns; he did not rule them at the time of the raids. So he was not a b
by e15ctr0n 6y ago
> considered by many to have been a brutal ruler
He raided these places in military campaigns; he did not rule them at the time of the raids. So he was not a brutal ruler. In fact, he was a benevolent ruler, distributing loot equally and promoting on merit rather than nepotism.
As another commentator has pointed out, the brutality was an intimidation tactic. It was very selectively applied. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23708182 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23708182
He also did much to bring modern human rights to his subjects. You can read about it in Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World by Jack Weatherford, an anthropologist who lives in Mongolia part-time. https://amzn.com/B000FCK206 https://amzn.com/B000FCK206