3 ms·
That's an irresponsible use of the word "theoretically". What actual theory would have them do that? You're describing a coordination problem of absurd proporti
by rcoveson 6y ago
That's an irresponsible use of the word "theoretically". What actual theory would have them do that? You're describing a coordination problem of absurd proportions and you haven't even proposed a shared motive.
It like saying, "This specific aspect of society could change if a potency-majority were fully committed to the idea that it should be changed in that way."
- HenryKissinger 6y agoYou're absolutely right. I don't try to pretend that it would be possible in the slightest. Just that stock wealth is a societal, and thus arbitrary, construct, unlike, say, gold and precious gems, which have intrinsic value across time, space, and cultures.
- therealdrag0 6y agoAt some point stock is as intrinsically valuable as gold, when it has legal support and billions of people buying and selling it. I have no interest in gold and I never will afaict.