Seems interesting, but that's got to be the worst footnote practice I've ever seen: notes 2 and 3 are used to reference something like 30 separate publications,

Seems interesting, but that's got to be the worst footnote practice I've ever seen: notes 2 and 3 are used to reference something like 30 separate publications, along with maybe two comment, using only two very long sentences set in small font. Ugh, what a crime against typography.