Zit-popping channels on YouTube are fairly common. I’m not familiar with the details but it seems people who can’t afford a dermatologist find care that way. Th

Zit-popping channels on YouTube are fairly common. I’m not familiar with the details but it seems people who can’t afford a dermatologist find care that way. Their full face is never filmed so I’m not sure there are blatant issues. An interesting thing is: patients from areas with poor hygiene, etc. tend to have massive zits, which are clearly the most popular —— so there’s still a whiff of poverty as spectacle. But I don’t have a self-paying economic model for care in that case. More to the point, I’m always curious about claims that newborns have image rights. I get the principle. Less sure about specific damages. I’d be interested in the idea that showing the process helps medical education. Antivaxxers (and careless drivers) have benefited from rules about not showing gruesome medical images broadly, including recently with COVID.