3 ms·
The line of defense here is really strange, in order the author runs a whole gamut 1. No this code is original, it's not copied 2. Yes it's copied but it's MI
by chownie 6y ago
The line of defense here is really strange, in order the author runs a whole gamut
1. No this code is original, it's not copied
2. Yes it's copied but it's MIT so it's okay
3. No actually they copied me and being MIT means you can't sue me
4. You are a "junior" developer and actually you're jealous of my achievements which is why you made this issue
5. "Loser"
6. Author locks the PR
7. Author renames the PR to hide it
8. Author archives the whole project, but takes some time first to write his rebuttal in the PR where no one can reply
Really bizarre response
- PedroBatista 6y agoNo rationality here, he knows he "got caught" and from there his clearly out-sized ego took the wheel.
- rvz 6y agoThis reaction looks like he's more guilty in this situation and his infant-like behaviour is shown here. While it's MIT and allows him to modify, improve, etc he didn't read this last sentence in the archriss/react-native-image-gallery library: ...provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. No credit was given despite having a 98% derived copy of the source. After (3), the 'argument' descends into personal attacks. He definitely knows he's in the wrong and is smoke-screening the discussion by locking, archiving and hiding the PR, like a 'professional lead senior developer'.