> We had already had created this anonymous favicon service for our private search engine. I don't think here's a need for adjectives here. Why stress that it'

> We had already had created this anonymous favicon service for our private search engine. I don't think here's a need for adjectives here. Why stress that it's anonymous (when that's hard to verify) or that the search engine is private, when that too is starting to come into question? Repeating these things won't will them into the reader's perception. > In addition, doing it this way avoids another request (and potentially multiple) to the end site. This isn't true, unless I'm missing something here? When I access a website, the HTML response I get from that website includes all the information my browser needs to, on its own, get and display the favicon. Can you clarify why you think/say this avoids one or more requests? What mechanism is this service a substitute for?