What? You demolished what point? To this: > When only 1 book was written, people read it, loved it and recommended it. As it was: 1 sole book. You answered th

What? You demolished what point? To this: > When only 1 book was written, people read it, loved it and recommended it. As it was: 1 sole book. You answered this: > 'Would you have read GoT if you knew that GRRM would rather write a prequel than finish the current series.' I am pretty sure everyone will say NO. Which doesn't make sense. When only the first book was written, people did not recommend the complete saga, and the value put on book #7 was close to 0. What they were recommending to colleagues, and reading by the thousands, was just the first book. If you reread what I said, I'm directly pointing to a counterexample to your reasoning that the saga is not interesting without book seven - because it was, back when it was 1 book, then when it was just 2, etc. Anyway, adiós!