I find it much easier to argue from the moral perspective. It's my right to hide whatever I want, regardless of whether somebody else considers it "something t

I find it much easier to argue from the moral perspective. It's my right to hide whatever I want, regardless of whether somebody else considers it "something to hide" or not; just as it's your right to buy a 3m tall chocolate statue of yourself, regardless of whether I think it's something you need. The question is not "is it really necessary?" but "who the #£$! gave you the right to decide whether I consider it to be necessary for myself?" Then again, here in (east) Germany, somebody argues "I have nothnig to hide", you just tell them "Neither did people 40 years ago" and the conversation is pretty much over.