5 ms·
Seems a bit much, but k-anonymity could work here. Hash the domain, take the prefix, get a batch of favicons back. They won’t know which you visited, but still
by zeckalpha 6y ago
Seems a bit much, but k-anonymity could work here. Hash the domain, take the prefix, get a batch of favicons back. They won’t know which you visited, but still get the benefits of consistent favicon support.
- bad_user 6y agoAnd how would they get the "batch of favicons" in the first place?
- jhasse 6y agoWhen there's a miss, send the domain to the server so that it can fill the cache. You probably won't even have to do that as DDG could have already filled the cache with their search results.
- bad_user 6y agoOK, at what point does it become complicated enough to just implement that shit client side? :-)
- smolder 6y agoThat's an elegant fix, but for a problem that wouldn't exist if the feature was properly designed. (IOW, designed as a local function.)